Federalizing individual medical decisions The second example involves the federal healthcare reform bill enacted last year. The government is spending too much, and will soon exceed its legally mandated debt limit.
This agency will have broad and pervasive power over healthcare prices in America — and through this power to control prices, the IPAB will effectively be able to ration the delivery of healthcare services to the American public.
Patrick GarryRenewAmerica analyst June 14, Ever since the elections, with the prominent role of the Tea Party, there has been much discussion about big, centralized government. This problem is similarly illustrated by the healthcare reform bill, under which companies and unions What meaning big government able to apply for waivers from various provisions of the bill.
Indeed, the federal government has already granted hundreds of such waivers. Clearly, we have come to a situation where government has gone beyond its role as agent of the people.
Indeed, the phrase "big government" is now more than ever a pejorative in the American lexicon. Under the new healthcare reform bill, medical decisions will What meaning big government dictated by the pricing and regulatory decisions of a federal agency. Yet polls suggest that the public, though disliking the phrase, does not have a clear, tangible idea as to what exactly is so bad about big government.
The Framers, in drafting a constitution giving only limited power to the federal government, knew that a host of problems and liberty deprivations would occur with a centralized government of near unlimited activity and authority, including a lack of transparency and accountability, and the imposition by federal bureaucrats of uniform mandates on a large and diverse society.
Ironically, in the abortion debate, pro-choice advocates argue that all medical decisions should be left to the doctor-patient relationship. The current debt-ceiling debate demonstrates, unfortunately, how much that relationship has been inverted. If the NLRB can act with such arbitrary and unbounded punitive discretion regarding a law-abiding corporation the size of Boeing, imagine what government agencies can do regarding individuals and small businesses.
This government backing was possible because the federal government had spread its tentacles into both the individual home-buying and mortgage-issuing sectors of the economy.
Pushed by government officials, who in turn perpetuated its monopoly privileges, Fannie Mae violated traditional standards of underwriting, building up illusory profits in the process by issuing mortgages to people and households with insufficient assets.
Yet those who wish to couple any increase in the debt limit with some kind of spending reduction plan are belittled as reckless ideologues — willing to risk a financial crisis for the sake of their ideological beliefs in limited government.
But those waivers, by definition, are privileges given to a select few, as determined by the discretion of government officials. We the people The danger What meaning big government big and unlimited government is that, over time, it can distort the most basic notion of sovereignty and principal-agent.
But as demonstrated by such recent legislation as the healthcare reform act and the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill, these big government programs also provide for unbounded power and discretion by federal bureaucrats.
Unbounded bureaucratic discretion and the threat to the rule of law The nature of big government is that it is almost always justified in terms of lofty, idealistic, even utopian the-country-will-be-saved arguments. But one of the inevitable consequences of huge size and unlimited scope is that the actual working details often get lost amidst that huge size and unlimited scope.
It now seems to have an independent existence that in turn must be supported by the people merely for the sake of perpetuating a government that has no limits. Creating chaos in the housing market In their recently released book Reckless Endangerment, Gretchen Morgenson and Joshua Rosner reveal how Fannie Mae contributed to the financial crisis of There is also a rule-of-law problem posed by a government of vast powers.
And the acts of big government are almost always billed as reformist. Fannie Mae was able to engage in such reckless lending because of its government backing, which helped drive out competitors while at the same time insulating Fannie Mae from any bank-style regulation.
This was all done pursuant to a political agenda of increasing home ownership by the poor and minorities, but it ended up causing a financial debacle costing hundreds of billions of dollars, not to mention the harm caused to all the families who later defaulted on their mortgages and had their homes foreclosed.
Conservatives, libertarians, and Tea Party activists argue that America has drifted too far from the constitutional principle of limited government — that the federal government is becoming too big, too powerful, with an unlimited scope of authority.
Two examples may provide an answer. Words like "privilege" and "select few" and "discretion" do not go along with any notion of the rule of law.The thesaurus of synonyms and related words is fully integrated into the dictionary.
Click on the thesaurus category heading under the button in an entry to see the synonyms and related words for that meaning. more. The government has been slow to react to the crisis. She works for the federal government. We need to improve relations with foreign governments. He is a firm believer in democratic government.
We learned about different methods of government. The country has been damaged by many years of weak government. The verbal noun is the -ing form, i.e.
the present participle of the verb, used as a noun. It can be used in all the places that a noun can be. Big Government Virgil: Anonymous and Bob Woodward, The Deep State’s One-Two Punch on Donald Trump The Main Stream Media have.
The meaning of big government. Patrick Garry, RenewAmerica analyst. June 14, Ever since the elections, with the prominent role of the Tea Party, there has been much discussion about big, centralized government.
Big government is a term used to describe a government or public sector that is excessively large and unconstitutionally involved in certain areas of .Download