The ethical debate over the decision to drop the atomic bomb will never be resolved. On August 9, a second atomic bomb was dropped on Nagasaki, where 80, Japanese people perished. Other critics argued that American diplomats had ulterior motives. Leo Szilard, one of the scientists on the Manhattan Project, predicting the use of the bomb would start the arms race with the Soviet Union.
Not only were the alternatives a strong enough reason not to use the bomb but the consequences of using the atomic bomb should have played a part in the decision-making to drop the bomb. Even though they still have an emperor, the power rests in the hands of politicians. The United States will always try to avoid the loss of American civilians at all costs, even if that means taking lives of another countries innocent civilians.
Killing needlessly was a concern for some American officials. Even the scientific community failed to foresee the awful effects of radiation sickness.
S, needed to drop those bombs to end the war according to the president at that time, Harry Truman. American forces occupied Okinawa and Iwo Jima and were intensely fire bombing Japanese cities. Not only could the lives of many soldiers have been taken, but possibly the lives of many innocent Americans.
A "mushroom" cloud rises over the city of Nagasaki on August 9,following the detonation of "Fat Man. The bombs did, however, bring an end to the most destructive war in history. But Japan had an army of 2 million strong stationed in the home islands guarding against invasion. Leaky, Chief of Staff to Franklin D.
The question that came flying out was, "How will the world use its nuclear capability? The capacity to end the war with Japan was in his hands, but it would involve unleashing the most terrible weapon ever known.
In a diplomatic sense, the U. I believe that this was one of the best alternatives to using the atomic bomb and should have been used. A Normandy-type amphibious landing would have cost an estimated million casualties. When Harry Truman learned of the success of the Manhattan Project, he knew he was faced with a decision of unprecedented gravity.
In addition to this pressure, there was a hatred for the Japanese, political problems that the U. In the months and years that followed, an additionalperished from burns and radiation sickness.Scientists reported that the “Atomic bomb was equivalent to bringing the sun to earth.” Scientists say that the explosion of the atomic bomb was equal to 13 kilotons of TNT.
The immense power from the atomic bomb made scientists scared as they believed dropping the atomic bomb would initiate a nuclear age.
Truman's Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb Many debates have been provoked based on President Truman's decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in The debate is not solely based on the bomb being dropped, but more on the actual necessity and intention of the bomb being dropped.
The Decision of a Lifetime: Dropping the Atomic Bomb on Japan Essay examples - The dropping of the atomic bomb may be one of the most controversial topics in American history. Could there have been another way to end. Essay title: The Decision to Drop the Atomic Bomb President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were the direct cause for the end of World War II in the Pacific/5(1).
The Dropping of the Atomic Bombs during WWII On August 6th the United States, under President Harry S. Truman, dropped the first of two atomic bombs on Hiroshima, a fairly large city in Japan.
Three days later on August 9th, a second atomic bomb was dropped on another Japanese city, Nagasaki. A big question that is still argued today. Americas Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb History Essay.
Jeremy Schleicher. Period 4. Atomic Bomb DBQ. Thesis SFI. America's executive decision to drop the atomic bomb on the Japanese was done for the sole reason of ensuring our power over the Soviet Union, and the surrender of Japan was a mere side-effect of the bombing.Download