MERGE already exists as an alternate of this question. So it may appear for non-Muslims that Isalm in south-Asia is more moderate than in middle-east. Although the Nationalists would crush the Communists efforts to overthrow the government, the Communist Party would eventually return and take control, changing China forever.
In relation to western Europe instead of Asia it is in the "middle of the east". Contact Author Source When WWI began in the early 20th century it sparked a political tornado of change that swept over the entire world, augmenting everything in its path.
Intellectuals like Gandhi appeared with ideas as to what a post-colonial India should look like, and almost everyone in India, Muslims and Hindus alike, agreed they wanted England out. But to my understanding, the Vietnam War created divisions between the American popluation and the government.
These countries were not as affected by the war as Europe.
Some countries included in Southeast Asia: A demonstration broke out in Beijing in protest over the aftermath of the Treaty of Versailles. Also, due to American tactics such as "Operation Ranch-Hand" which used chemicals such as Agent Orange to defoliate the rainforests, vast areas of natural resources became useless.
After being defeated by both Japan and the West, China had enough humiliation and demanded social reform.
This, combined with the oppressive efforts to force Indian soldiers into the war, caused the Indian Nationalist movement to return full force.
Even though after the war, South Vietnam did eventually be defeated by the Communists, it remained very weak and therefore no longer any real threat to the US itself. The American government was also deeply shocked by the proceedings in Vietnam.
When England forced India, a colony of the United Kingdom at the time, to support the war effort, the Indians complied and the Nationalist movement remained dormant during the war. Japan was especially lacking in petroleum and SE Asia also provided rubber, rice, and a market to sell finished goods to.
What were the effects of colonization in East Asia south Asia and the middle east? On the other hand, in South Asia there are a wide range of religions so Muslims there have the power to communicate with people from any religion.
Why did japan invade south east Asia? People could see for the first time the devastation caused by war, and this put a massive pressure on future governments for peace and an end to American involvement in future international disputes.
Why is southwest Asia called the middle east? What is the capital of south east Asia?4/1/10 Compare and Contrast United States foreign policy after the First World War and after the Second World War. Consider the periods and United States foreign policy has always been characterized by a commitment to free trade, protection of American interests, and a concern for human rights.
Contrast(outcome): Mexico and Russia had different outcomes. Russia became communist while Mexico established a constitutional republic. Contrast(outcome): Russia became more isolated from the world while Mexico continued to be a participant in trade with other countries, with products such as oil.
While World War I ultimately increased internal conflict within East Asia, as hostilities between China and Japan grew due to Japan's acquisition of Shandong following the Treaty of Versailles, there was little internal dispute within the Middle East, with most conflict being imposed by outside influences.
Compare And Contrast How The First World War And Its Outcomes Affected East Asia, Middle East, And South Asia In The Period From The War Through The 's? 2. Compare and contrast how the First World War and its outcomes affected TWO of the following regions in the period from the war through the ’s.
East Asia Middle East South Asia (Indian subcontinent) 1. What were the World War 1 effects on east Asia and the Middle East? These countries were not as affected by the war as Europe.
They didform a few new ties that ended up causing issues in WWII.Download